,
McMaster Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Workshop Resources – Therapy module
,
Short Description:
McMaster Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Workshop – Therapy module.
Key Concepts addressed:- čeština
- Chinese
- Cartoons
- Choices: making informed choices
- Claims: are they justified?
- Comparisons: are they fair and reliable?
- dansk
- Deutsche
- Euskara
- Gaeilge
- Greek
- Hrvatski
- italiano
- 1-1 Treatments can harm
- 1-10 Hope may lead to unrealistic expectations
- 1-11 Explanations about how treatments work can be wrong
- 1-8 More is not necessarily better
- 2-4 Comparison groups should be treated equally
- 1-6 Expert opinion is not always right
- 2-10 Peer-review and publication does not guarantee reliable information
- 2-11 All fair comparisons and outcomes should be reported
- 1-3 Association is not the same as causation
- 1-4 Common practice is not always evidence-based
- 2-6 Peoples' outcomes should be assessed similarly
- 2-14 Average measures of effects can be misleading
- 2-1 Comparisons are needed to identify treatment effects
Details
This is the therapy module resources provided to the attendees at the McMaster Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Workshop.
This contains:
- Clinical problem: an outline of the module objectives and a specialty-specific clinical scenario describing a patient problem relevant to the module (Internal Medicine), Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, and Surgery).
- Clinical article: one or more speciality-specific clinical papers pertinent to the problem posed in the scenario (Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, and Surgery).
- Worksheet: Critical appraisal worksheet for organizing ideas as readers work through articles.
This package is one of several other packages included in the McMaster Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Workshop such as Systematic Review, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.